Chief Justice John Roberts joined the court’s liberals in dissent from the court’s decision to permit the funding halt.

The Supreme Court is allowing the Trump administration to slash hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of research funding in ...

Under Chief Judge John Roberts, the United States Supreme Court has stepped up its use of the "emergency docket," writes ...

President Trump kicked off a nationwide race to redraw political maps after he urged Texas Republicans to draw five more GOP-leaning seats ahead of the 2026 midterms.

California Governor Gavin Newsom has announced plans to move forward with a redistricting initiative aimed at countering GOP-led gerrymandering efforts in Texas.

The Supreme Court’s conservative majority kicked away the best, even last, chance at a national solution to a national ...

Texas Rep. Richard Raymond voiced harsh opposition to the GOP mid-decade redistricting plan, warning it’d harm minority ...

Based on the Supreme Court's history under Chief Justice John Roberts, the Voting Rights Act is quite ... the “composite nation” of Frederick Douglass’ aspirations: a United States that served as home ...

While the Voting Rights Act may be heading to its demise as a functional piece of legislation, it can still stand as a symbol: of our collective capacity to expand the horizons of democratic life; ...

The Supreme Court may extinguish a law that more than any other made the promise of American democracy a reality.

Chief Justice John Roberts, in an opinion for a 5-4 court, declared that federal judges could not review extreme partisan gerrymanders to determine if they violated constitutional rights.

Chief Justice John Roberts, in an opinion for a 5-4 court, declared that federal judges could not review extreme partisan gerrymanders to determine if they violated constitutional rights.