The Polaroid Now+ is technically an upgrade to last year’s $99 Polaroid Now—but it’s really just a modern take on a retro Polaroid instant film camera. Even the styling should be familiar to anyone ...

By contrast, Polaroid i-Type film packs do not have a battery – and thus, they will not work with vintage Polaroid 600 cameras. They are designed exclusively for, and will only work with, modern ...

Priced at $150, the digital-equipped instant camera comes with five lens filters and works with Polaroid’s battery-free i-Type film.

Basquiat Edition is covered in Jean-Michel Basquiat’s famous artwork ‘Boy and Dog in a Johnnypump’ and is a must-have for ...

Before you use the film, you're probably going to want to buy the Polaroid 600 Disney Mickey Mouse Camera. If that's the case, you can purchase one for $199.99 on Polaroid Original's website.

The Polaroid Now is the classic company’s latest instant film camera. It’s $99 and features a viewfinder, self-timer, double exposure, and supports Polaroid’s 600 film and the newer I-Type film.

It's so easy to screw up an exposure with the old Polaroid, and at $20 per eight-pack of film, every mistake is costly. The new I-2 camera could be the solution to this problem.

The Polaroid Originals OneStep 2, like the first OneStep from 1977, is a simple point-and-shoot analog instant film camera. There is a built-in flash, (a vacuum discharge tube strobe, to be ...

I don't know what's more upsetting, the fact that Polaroid is done producing the instant film and cameras, or the fact that their last breath of life will be sold at Urban Outfitters. If you're ...

But Polaroid Originals also developed a new film for the OneStep 2, called i-Type. The film is specifically optimized for the new camera and won't work with vintage models.

On the topic of film, with the smallest camera also comes the brand’s smallest film size. The Polaroid Go Starter Bundle includes a double-pack of color film for the camera.

When Polaroid stopped making instant film cameras in 2007 and ceased instant-film production the following year, it was sad—but also, in the era of digital photography, perfectly understandable.